Quick Take: Christian Legal Society v. Martinez

24 Apr

Here is my quick take on CLS v. Martinez

1. Colleges and universities that receive federal funding should not be able to discriminate against groups because they are religious in nature. There needs to be equal protection and equal treatment.

2. In this case, CLS is not being denied the ability to gather, associate, speak, etc. They are being denied funding from the school because of their ban on gays, etc.

3. Christian groups should have an expectation that they can gather and meet on campuses; they should not expect to receive funding from the school to further their mission.

On a prima facia level — from someone with no legal training — I think that CLS is incorrect on this issue. If they were being banned from campus, were not being allowed to assemble on campus, etc, then I think they have a winning case. If the issue is just funding, then I think they don’t have a case.

This issue can get very complicated on college campuses. For example, on some campuses the issue is “official recognition” which triggers opportunity for funding, access to meeting space, ability to advertise on campus, etc. In that case, I think the Christian group would have a stronger case since lack of official recognition is tantamount to not being allowed to meet and this would violate the equal access/equal protection principals.

My final thought is this… should Christian student ministries really expect funding from schools? Is this even a good idea?  My gut says no. I have worked in campus ministry a long time — for both evangelical parachurch groups (like CLS) and via churches (both evangelical and mainline). My opinion is that these ministries should look for ways to serve the campus community, be bold in their outreach and presence, and neither take nor expect official funding.

So that is my quick take… what is yours?

1 Comment

Posted by on April 24, 2010 in Uncategorized


One response to “Quick Take: Christian Legal Society v. Martinez

  1. Bruce

    April 24, 2010 at 4:00 pm

    <p>I agree with you. They should not seek or expect any funding from any public coffers. That should be the same with any "group" on campus. They should each be able to make a requisite for a space to meet, equally allotted for each group according to its size and function requirements, and expect no assistance beyond that.</p><p>And, nobody should be able to tell the groups who should and shouldn’t be allowed to be a part of them. A group can remain exclusionary if it chooses to be so, or not. (Like if a woman wanted to join an all men’s group discussing men’s sexual issues, etc)</p><p>This is the only fair way to keep equality across the board.</p><p>Mediation should only be inserted in extreme situations (violence, etc.).</p><p>I know it is not a simple "either-or" kind of decision, but you have to start with real freedom.</p><p>Just my quick thoughts…</p>



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: